Paradigm Shift In Lecturing Towards Students In The Post-Pandemic Context: Challenges And Ethical Implications

Authors

  • Muhammad RAFLISYAH Yogyakarta State University, Indonesia
  • Indyra YASMIN Yogyakarta State University, Indonesia
  • Novia Ayu LATIFA Yogyakarta State University, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61857/cssdev.v1i1.37

Keywords:

Competence, Participation, Leadership, Pro-Social, accountability

Abstract

During the period of online learning in Indonesia, various issues related to learner ethics were found. According to the Human Capital Index 2020, the knowledge of students in Indonesia who are expected to complete 12 years of schooling, due to the pandemic they are only equivalent to 7 years of learning. When they move on to the university level, this causes a decrease in the social ethics possessed by each student due to the pandemic product because they do not directly get a good learning process and knowledge in ethical implications. This research aims to look at the challenges and ethical implications in the post-pandemic context. This research seeks to dissect the factors that cause students’ paradigm shifts in post- pandemic lectures. In this study, researchers will conduct a case study on the paradigm shift of lectures to the academic community of Yogyakarta State University. The research sample used was purposive sampling technique, so that researchers used samples of students and lecturers at the Faculty of Social, Legal and Political Sciences, Yogyakarta State University. The results of this study are expected to be a study material and reference source for students and lecturers to fix the ethical implications in the context of post-pandemic learning as well as a wise reflection in responding to changes in the previous educational period.

References

Anwar, Y., & Adang. (2013). Sosiologi Untuk Universitas. Refika Aditama.

Arikunto, & Suharsimi. (2002). Prosedur Penelitian : Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Rineka Cipta.

Bertens, K. (1993). Etika. Gramedia.

Budyatna, M., & MG, L. (2011). Teori Komunikasi Antar Pribadi. Kencana.

Donnely, R., & Patrinos, H. . (2022). Learning Loss During Covid-19: An Early Systematic Review. Prospects, 4(51), 601–609.

Farah, B., & Nasution, R. D. (2020). Analisis Perubahan Orientasi Pola Hidup Mahasiswa Pasca Berakhirnya Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Noken: Ilmu- Ilmu Sosial, 5(2), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.33506/jn.v5i2.968

Haryatmoko. (2016). Membongkar Rezim Kepastian: Pemikiran Kritis Post- Strukturalis. PT Kanisius.

Haryo. (2022). Tantangan Pendidikan Pasca Pandemi di Perguruan Tinggi. https://www.uny.ac.id/id/berita/tantangan-pendidikan-pasca-pandemi-di- perguruan-tinggi

Ismail, M. J. (2021). Pendidikan Karakter Peduli Lingkungan Dan Menjaga Kebersihan Di Sekolah. Guru Tua : Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 4(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.31970/gurutua.v4i1.67

Jayani, D. H. (2022). Akibat Pandemi, Pengetahuan Siswa Indonesia Hanya Setara 7 Tahun Belajar. https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2022/01/06/akibat-pandemi- pengetahuan-siswa-indonesia-hanya-setara-7-tahun-belajar

Kimball, S. (2023). WHO Declares End to Covid-19 Global Public Health Emergency. https://www.cnbc.com/2023/05/05/who-declares-end-to-covid- global-public-health-emergency.html

Moleong. (2007). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (Edisi Revi). PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nasution. (2011). Metode Research Penelitian Ilmiah. PT Bumi Aksara. Nurhudaya. (2021). Perubahan Sosial Psikologi di Masa Pandemi Covid. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.

Peraturan Rektor UNY No 19 Tahun 2018 Tentang Kode Etik dan Etika Akademik Mahasiswa UNY, (2018).

Polit, D. F., & Beck. (2004). Nursing Research: Principles and Methods. 7th Edition, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, 7.

Raflisyah, M., Aini, S. N., Kurniawan, F., & Hayati, A. R. (2023). Students’ Ethic in Virtual Classroom During the Pandemic. Proceedings of the International Conference of Social Science and Education 2021, 109–115.

Rakhmat, M. (2013). Etika Profesi: Etika Dasar Setiap Profesi Kehidupan dalam Perspektif Hukum Positif. LoGoz Publishing.

Salamah. (2004). Paradigma Pendidikan Tinggi dan Tuntutan Terhadap Profesionalitas Civitas Akademika. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337811558

Sarwono, J. (2006). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif. Graha Ilmu. Semiawan, C. R. (1998). Pendidikan Tinggi; Peningkatan Kemampuan Mannusia

Sepanjang Hayat Seoptimal Mungkin. Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi. Soekanto, S. (2012). Sosiologi Suatu Pengantar. Rajawali Pers.

Sugiyono. (2007). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta. Surajiyo. (2013). Filsafat Ilmu & Perkembanganya di Indonesia. Bumi Aksara.

Wijaya, E. Y., Sudjimat, D. A., Nyoto, A., & Malang, U. N. (2016). Transformasi Pendidikan Abad 21 sebagai Tuntutan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia di Era Global. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika.

Yolanda, C., & Fatmariza, F. (2019). Pergeseran Nilai-nilai Moral Masyarakat dan Implikasinya Terhadap Moralitas Remaja di Kecamatan IV Nagari Bayang Utara Kabupaten Pesisir Selatan. Journal of Civic Education, 2(3), 182–189. https://doi.org/10.24036/jce.v2i3.152

Zaenudiin, M., Asiah, D. H. S., Santoso, M. B., & Rifai, A. A. (2021). Perubahan Perilaku Masyarakat Jawa Barat dalam Melaksanakan Adaptasi Kebiasaan Baru di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Share: Social Work Journal, 11(1), 1–12.

Downloads

Published

30-11-2023

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.